Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) (General questions)
On a secure system, it is desirable not to have data written to disk, at least for my implementation.
I currently am dumping to file, and then loading it right back into memory - would prefer to skip that step, since it was already in memory. Thought it ight be a nice feature add.
Would Byte Array not work? Isn't that what a file is anyway?
Thanks!
Complete thread:
- Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-27, 20:27
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 01:00
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 02:19
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 02:49
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 13:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-29, 02:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-29, 04:56
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-30, 01:31
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-29, 04:56
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-29, 02:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 13:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 02:49
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 02:19
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 01:00