Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) (General questions)
Dave,
I guess we could make it accept a string data - which will cause problems with non-english systems when converted to/from binary.. We could also use byte arrays which will not work on some systems.. Or VARIANTS...
Hmm. What I'm trying to say is that we could add this - just need to agree on the right solution.
But - why don't you dump your stuff to temporary file, encode, and delete the file? Just curious?
Kreso
Complete thread:
- Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-27, 20:27
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 01:00
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 02:19
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 02:49
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 13:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-29, 02:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-29, 04:56
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-30, 01:31
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-29, 04:56
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-29, 02:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 13:54
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 02:49
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - D Waters, 2006-11-28, 02:19
- Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - wodSupport, 2006-11-28, 01:00