Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) - WeOnlyDo Discussion board

Re: Encode and Decode in Memory (Feature request) (General questions)

by D Waters, Wednesday, November 29, 2006, 04:56 (6569 days ago) @ wodSupport

Thanks for all the effort! I am testing the new features - but am finding it only works with VERY small files. If I attempt to encode a file that is 5KB in size - no problem. But when I move to a file that is 150KB it crashes. I can use the old process (write to file, read from file) with the same dataset, and it works, so it looks like there is a problem in the new method. I am regualrly working with much larger files (10 or more MB) 100KB is too small.

Not sure if it is a fixable bug? Or just something that can't be done due to other limitation - let me know!

Thanks again!

(Also, to answer your questions Binhex is not important to me today, but UUEn/Decode would be nice to have in memory as well - although the size issue is bigger issue. I use BASE64 and Quoted-Printable most often, UUEncode less, and Binhex not at all (yet).


Complete thread: