Re: sFTP overhead - WeOnlyDo Discussion board

Re: sFTP overhead (General questions)

by wodSupport, Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 13:08 (6436 days ago) @ grigsoft

Igor,

if we move ActiveX/COM technology aside, we do have wodSFTPdll and wodFtpDLX built as regular dynamic or static libraries. We do not sell these - simply because this would introduce TOOOOO much techsupport issues without actual benefit (in terms of money, of course).. Yes, it's all about money after all :)

But when you purchase wodFtpDLX with the source (this is needed since you may need to make certain tweaks), I will include those libraries too, and will help you incorporate them into your project. We did have customers that did it before.

As for non-MSVCRT dependancy.. I am not sure if you can avoid MSVC6 to build libraries like that.

Where there are two libraries? Pick one :) One is windowless DLL, another is Explorer-Alike GUI OCX. Both are FTP components, but OCX one is nicer, it's a matter of choice which one to use.

It doesn't make sense to incorporate wodCertificate into wodFtpDLX since wodCertificate is shared between all our (SSL related) components, and not everyone use it anyway. If you don't need it, you can avoid distributing it completely.

Hope I helped.

Kreso


Complete thread: