1. Home

Product groups

Support

{wodTelnetDLX} versus {wodSSH} - WeOnlyDo Discussion board

{wodTelnetDLX} versus {wodSSH} (wodSSH / wodSSH.NET)

by Robert, Friday, August 20, 2004, 19:06 (7398 days ago)

{wodTelnetDLX} versus {wodSSH}

Are there any differences between wodTelnetDLX and wodSSH besides the additional support of a GUI interface.

I guess what I'm really trying to get at is, I am working on a TELNET client application and would like to add support for SSH1, SSH2 and SSL connections; however, I do not need or want the GUI interface.

So, am I better off purchasing wodSSH or does the wodTelnetDLX offer more features and still allow me to use it without the GUI implmentation?

Thanks,
Robert

locked
  2731 views

Re: {wodTelnetDLX} versus {wodSSH}

by wodSupport, Friday, August 20, 2004, 20:09 (7398 days ago) @ Robert

Hi.

I suggest wodTelnetDLX. It's just a little more expensive ($10 I believe) but it does support SSL also (which wodSSH doesn't), has GUI (you don't need it now, may need in the future) etc..

There are no options that wodSSH does have and wodTelnetDLX doesn't.

Best regards,
Kreso

locked
  2729 views

Re: {wodTelnetDLX} versus {wodSSH}

by Robert, Monday, August 23, 2004, 04:27 (7396 days ago) @ wodSupport

Well, I took you advise and started down the path of testing with wodTelnetDLX; however, I have noticed a few properties in the wodSSH, that I cannot seem to find in the wodTelnetDLX component.

Encryption: Determines the encryption algorithm to be used with SSH.

Compression: Determines the level of compression used.

ForwardHost: Determines the hostname that data will be forwarded to with SSH tunneling.

ForwardPort : Determines if wodSSH will only forward data to remote port.

I am VERY new to SSH, SSL; however I have noticed these type of options in most commercial terminal emulation applications. So, does wodTelnetDLX have a way to configure these properties?

Thank You, Robert.

locked
  2725 views

Re: {wodTelnetDLX} versus {wodSSH}

by wodSupport, Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 00:30 (7395 days ago) @ Robert

Ouch. My mistake. You are correct - these features are common to SSH protocol and that's why they exist. wodTelnetDLX is somehow more oriented to have support for all Protocols it implements (and doesn't go specific into some protocols) and that's why it doesn't have those items. If you think they're important, you should use wodSSH.

Kreso

locked
  2786 views

...wodFtpDlx was exactly what I needed, it worked, and it was priced right...

David Keenan
Serengeti Systems Incorporated

It is very refreshing to find such helpful, knowledgeable and quick responding technical support.

Jason Sears
CompuSource Systems, Inc.

WeOnlyDo!COM will be the first stop I make should I require any further off-the-shelf components.

Dean Keigan
RBC Capital Markets

We are having great success with your component ... email server that has over 750 000 mailboxes back ended by a SQL server...

Conrad Leigh
Leaf Wireless

Thank you for the great customer service ... I am really impressed with the wodSSH ActiveX control.

Andrew Ross
Kiwi Enterprises

The wodCrypt product is great and we appreciate your effort to add support for UNIX Crypt.

William Ruf
Siemens Information and Communication Networks

You did a great job on wodSSH and wodSSHServer! I got a lot for very little money. Thanks!

Dirk Bulinckx
bvba Woodstone

...with WOD's excellent support I was able to bypass Winsock and focus on the task at hand...

Sander Pool
Rhapsody Networks

WeOnlyDo!COM will be the first stop I make should I require any further off-the-shelf components.

Dean Keigan
RBC Capital Markets

We have recently completed a large 1200+ location project where reliable Telnet and SSH connectivity was required. wodSSH worked flawlessly and allowed our staff to complete our project ontime and within budget.

James Sievers
Harbor Technologies